When I awoke two years ago in Fairbanks, Alaska and heard that John McCain had chosen Sarah Palin as a Vice-Presidential candidate, I felt I had woken up in a never-ending dream, an improbable parallel reality.
(We Alaskans knew she had to be better than the previous governor, Frank Murkowski, but that was a very low bar, given that he had a 20% popularity rating. She appeared to be a bit of a feisty fluff-head, a breath of fresh air — but Vice-Presidential material? This must be a dream, I told myself.)
Apparently this dream-like improbable parallel reality has now continued for more than two years. I tell myself, “I am a psychologist. I work with dreams. If I am ever to wake up out of this dream, I clearly have to figure out, ‘What part of my psyche does Sarah Palin represent’”?
First thing that comes to mind: I have been in a culture that has been male-dominated for centuries, and it is time for a renewal of the feminine. OK. I get that. I’ve read Jung. I’ve seen the Da Vinci Code. I would have voted for Hillary. Yeah, that must be some of it; I want the woman-within-me to have more power.
So what else is it about Sarah Palin so that she inhabits this parallel dream world of mine? Well, she’s pretty, sometimes very pretty. As a male, pretty women kind of make my thinking function go a bit kerwonky. So I had better convince that Neanderthal lower self, We’re talking about a possible President here, not mating material… Just because she looks good doesn’t mean she should be President. It’s not convinced.
And what else? Well, Sarah can kill and gut a moose without being bothered by it. Now that could be a useful skill. At least here in Alaska, anyway. The one time I shot and butchered a moose it bothered me a lot, and I didn’t ever want to do it again. I can be just too sentimental about those beautiful, ungainly creatures. But maybe this killer instinct could be useful in politics. I could think of some politicians that might benefit by being disemboweled. Ah,that must be part of it, she represents the fearless hunter, the no- sentimentality-for-the-other, the hunter-killer-politician within.
Hmm. I wonder what else she could represent. Well, she has said some pretty off-the-wall things. Maybe she is the part of my psyche that isn’t afraid of speaking my mind, no matter how uninformed and idiotic it may sound, even if it takes new words to do so. So that must be more of it — she represents that opinionated part of me that is willing to speak without much knowledge about the facts. I know that part, all too well.
A voice within says, Don’t forget that she identifies with grizzly bears and pit bulls. Hmm. So maybe that grizzly part is my Shadow, my dark side — the aggressive, take-no-prisoners part of my personality. Yeah, I could use some of that grizzly bear/pit bull within. Sometimes I am just too willing to listen to the other person’s point of view.
Uh Oh. I suddenly realize that Sarah is not only a woman, and a pretty woman, but also an Alaskan woman. After 30 years in Alaska, I have learned the hard way never to underestimate Alaskan women. This could be a long dream.
michelle
13 years agoAmusing…..mmmmm….I can see why you might dream of Sarah Palin. She is gutsy, and pretty and smart – my guess is you like that type of woman. I find that reassuring – and at least she isn’t blonde! But Sarah Palin herself worries me…..I see a redneck American in the mould of George Bush, except that she is way smarter and way prettier, which makes her more credible. I am all for the empowerment of women, and getting some strong women in politics, but Sarah worries me. Bit of a nightmare really.
Cheryl Fuller
13 years agoOh dear, dreaming of Sarah Palin. This is a very worrisome dream. Negative anima perhaps?
Stephen Parker, Ph.D. (Article Selection, Commentary)
13 years agoCheryl —
For me, she would indeed be a negative anima — but I wonder if for many people she represents something positive for them — as Michelle writes in her comment — she is gusty, pretty and smart — none of these qualities, would qualify her for being President though — and the type of smart she is has nothing to do with intellect (which, given our recent previous Presidential history, is evidently not a requirement for being President)
michelle
13 years agoPhew! Sorry I didn’t pick up on the satire but difficult when I don’t know you really well. Negative anima, absolutely. But you know I see this type of woman as being a bit of a ‘plant’ – as in, setting women up for failure. Sorry maybe a bit paranoid, but it seems politics will only allow a certain kind of woman into polital arena with the boys. Women in politics ned to be more even tempered, logical and unemotional than their male counterparts.
We have male Prime Ministers that cry and it makes them more ‘human’, but I’ll guarantee that if our present Julia Gillard cried, that would be the end of her. There would probably be comments made about PMT or menopause. She is busy sprouting ‘sound’ economic policy – what ever happened to this left-wing party’s support for humanitarian and social issues. The feminine side of humanity is still being oppressed by the masculine principles of quite illogical left-brainism. I have no doubt Julia is a real woman, but she controls that aspect of herself very well.
Stephen Parker, Ph.D. (Article Selection, Commentary)
13 years agoYes, I think Sarah can play with the boys because she is not true to feminine values….